Search Results

Stravinsky: In 1930, he remarked, "I don't believe that anyone venerates Mussolini more than I ... I know many exalted personages, and my artist's mind does not shrink from political and social issues. Well, after having seen so many events and so many more or less representative men, I have an overpowering urge to render homage to your Duce. He is the saviour of Italy and – let us hope – Europe". Later, after a private audience with Mussolini, he added, "Unless my ears deceive me, the voice of Rome is the voice of Il Duce. I told him that I felt like a fascist myself... In spite of being extremely busy, Mussolini did me the great honour of conversing with me for three-quarters of an hour. We talked about music, art and politics".[112] When the Nazis placed Stravinsky's works on the list of "Entartete Musik", he lodged a formal appeal to establish his Russian genealogy and declared, "I loathe all communism, Marxism, the execrable Soviet monster, and also all liberalism, democratism, atheism, etc." Upon relocating to America in the 1940s, Stravinsky again embraced the liberalism of his youth, remarking that Europeans "can have their generalissimos and Führers. Leave me Mr. Truman and I'm satisfied." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Igor_Stravinsky#Personality

Interesting convo. Many in-jokes. Chatty and chummy. Politically incorrect imitations. David Coverdale's laugh seems like an old-school posh laugh, I can't help thinking, like posh fellow in an old film. Great laugh. Jonesy was right, about Bill and David both being from "your neck-o-the woods, wunnee ... Yorkshire" ... from the Coverdale Wiki: Coverdale was born on 22 September 1951, in Saltburn-by-the-Sea, North Riding of Yorkshire. Bill Nelson's Big Red Nose ... Big Red Noise? Hmm ... yes that wordplay and other wordplay herein is sort of John Lennon-ish.

He's a funny guy, but seems he hasn't moved on from his mid 80s hair-metal hey day.

"If you need to think in terms of responsibility, then it is your responsibility to have fun!  You will not help yourself or others unless you enjoy the miracle of your own being.  And so, in those terms, use (if you must) the belief in responsibility, by telling yourselves that it is your responsibility to enjoy your being." --Seth, 1974.05.21, "ESP" class "If it's not fun, stop doing it." --Seth, _Conversations with Seth_ [a book about the "ESP" class]

One is an individual first and foremost, but, after that, one likely falls into a "family of consciousness (a thrust of life)" as follows: From: Jane Roberts, The Unknown Reality, Vol. 2, session 737, Amber-Allen, San Rafael, CA, 1996, p. 599. Below is a summary of the innate, basic “family” of consciousness intents according to Seth and Rob Butts. Borledim Seth: closest to Sumari [below], deals primarily with parenthood. Rob: to provide an Earth stock for the species through parenthood. Milumet Seth: composed of mystics. Rob: to mystically nourish mankind’s psyche. Gramada Seth: specializes in organization. Rob: to found social systems. Vold Seth: primarily reformers. ...one purpose in mind: to change the status quo in whatever the area of primary interest. Rob: to reform the status quo. Ilda Seth: they deal primarily in the great play of exchange and interchange of ideas, products, social and political concepts. They are travelers, carrying with them ideas of one country to another, mixing cultures, religions, attitudes, political structures. Seth has great affection for these folks! Rob: to spread and exchange ideas. Sumari Seth: initiators, naturally playful – inventors, and relatively unfettered. They are impatient however. They will be found in the arts and in the less conventional sciences. Rob: to provide the cultural, spiritual, and artistic heritage for the species. Tumold Seth: primarily devoted to healing. Rob: to heal, regardless of individual occupation. Zuli Seth: involved mainly with the fulfillment of bodily activity. Rob: to serve as physical athletic models. Sumafi Seth: deals primarily with teaching, their primary interest of passing on knowledge to others. Rob: to transmit “originality” through teaching. There is more information on the nine “families” available at: http://www.cafemuse.com/sethnet/The_Nine_Families_of_Consciousness.html  "The categories [healing, teaching, or whatever] are general descriptions of the families of consciousness. You can split them up also and make further distinctions, if you choose. You can cut those divisions down. They merely represent interpretations that you can understand in your reality. In the most mundane of terms, some families are travelers, and some prefer to stay at home. But generally speaking, I have simply given you an outline which follows the characteristics of consciousness as it is embarked in physical form. I am not giving you these groups to set up divisions, but to help you understand that consciousness is diversified — that usually each of you falls, because you want to, into a certain family. And there you acquire friends, alliances, and counterparts." • "Now these families fall generally into certain groups. In greater terms you can “cut the pie” however you want to, but you will still share an emotional and psychic feeling of belonging with the family of which you are a part. And (with broad amusement) most of you here are Sumari, and it demands great discipline for Sumari to take down lists — even of psychic families!" • "Now (Seth told us last night) you can expand the functions of any particular family group, or you can cut it down, by deciding how precise you want to be. If one family deals with the nature of healing, then you can slice it down to the healing of a toe … an ear … an eye." —Seth, Unk Reality, 2, Appendix 26: (For Session 734)

Seth, Session 144: "The dream world ... is not apart from your so-called physical universe, for the dream universe, through its connection with the inner self, also helps to construct physical matter -- and this is no trifling matter." "It matters more than you know, and I will tell you what the matter is.. How do you like that play on words, Joseph?" "("It's beautiful.")" "I suspect some hint of sarcasm" ("Oh no.")" ... "Now. As you know, among other things dreams reflect inner expectation. For our visitor's edification, dreams are created by each individual, and given actual molecular structure and reality, within a different field than the one with which you are usually familiar." ... "Nevertheless, the actual individual dream world created by each individual will be a close resemblance to the physical environment which is also created by the individual."

Here is one that may interest some. https://www.seattletimes.com/life/travel/its-happening-again-inside-western-washingtons-twin-peaks-tourism/

He never really caught on with me completely despite once owning a Japan LP and a CD collaborating with Fripp. But thanks. Meanwhile, here are Dali's "blemishes" in the same vein: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvador_Dal%C3%AD#Politics_and_personality

"aesthetics of fascists" Hitler, the failed artist. "There have been people who tried to tell me that fascist symbolism and messages are to be found all throughout Cocteau’s work..." Hm. I never detected any.

@Alec I think I was around at the time (past life) and was impressed, unfortunately. My belief is that many baby boomers were WW II victims reincarnated.

@Alec As you may know, Picasso went in the Marxist direction: https://images.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search;_ylt=AwrExl_frOhc8kEAoQw2nIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTBsZ29xY3ZzBHNlYwNzZWFyY2gEc2xrA2J1dHRvbg--;_ylc=X1MDMTM1MTE5NTcwMgRfcgMyBGFjdG4DY2xrBGNzcmNwdmlkA2RjT0lYekV3TGpJQ29HQjRWaXJzZ0FZZ01qWXdNZ0FBQUFCWDFPTmcEZnIDeWhzdC1nb29kc2VhcmNoLWdvb2RzZWFyY2hfeWhzBGZyMgNzYS1ncARncHJpZANWUnZKNG9mR1NVYVZmTmpVY0FXSnNBBG5fc3VnZwM0BG9yaWdpbgNpbWFnZXMuc2VhcmNoLnlhaG9vLmNvbQRwb3MDMgRwcXN0cgNwaWNhc3NvJTIwc3RhbGluBHBxc3RybAMxNARxc3RybAMzMgRxdWVyeQNwaWNhc3NvJTIwcG9ydHJhaXQlMjBvZiUyMHN0YWxpbgR0X3N0bXADMTU1ODc1MjYyNg--?p=picasso+portrait+of+stalin&fr=yhst-goodsearch-goodsearch_yhs&fr2=sa-gp-images.search&ei=UTF-8&n=60&x=wrt&hsimp=yhs-goodsearch_yhs&hspart=goodsearch

Your beliefs can be like fences that surround you.... [The following is a] list [of] some limiting false beliefs. If you find yourself agreeing with any of them, then recognize this as an area in which you must personally work. 1. Life is a valley of sorrows. 2. The body is inferior. As a vehicle of the soul it is automatically degraded, tinged. … 3. I am helpless before circumstances that I cannot control. 4. … I am at the mercy of my past. 5. I am helpless because I am at the mercy of events from past lives … 6. People are basically bad, and out to get me. 7. I have the truth and no one else has…. 8. I will grow frailer, sicker, and lose my powers as I grow old. 9. ...When my body dies my consciousness dies with it. …That was a rather general list of false beliefs. Now here is a more specific list of more intimate beliefs, any of which you may have personally about yourself. 1. I am sickly, and always have been. 2. There is something wrong with money. People who have it are greedy… 3. I am not creative. I have no imagination. 4. I can never do what I want to do. 5. People dislike me. 6. I am fat. 7: I always have bad luck. These are all beliefs held by many people. Those who have them will meet them in experience. Physical data will always seem to reinforce the beliefs, therefore, but the beliefs formed the reality. There is one belief, however, that destroys artificial barriers to perception, an expanding belief that automatically pierces false and inhibiting ideas. …The Self Is Not Limited…. There Are No Boundaries or Separations of the Self…. You Make Your Own Reality…. --Seth, The Nature of the Personal Reality, Sess 614

"A bat first grew wings and of the proper kind, by its desire being organic enough to reach the sub-consciousness. If its desire to fly had been conscious, it would have had to wait till it could have done so by the same means as ourselves, i.e. by machinery." Spare on his views regarding the sub-conscious and conscious mind. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austin_Osman_Spare -----=----- "[Darwin's theory] has no real validity. Consciousness does indeed evolve form. Form does not evolve consciousness. "...the theory of evolution is as beautiful a tale as the theory of the Biblical creation.... Both ... cannot be realities. "Complicated physical forms are not the result of previous simple ones." --Seth Speaks, Sess 582

@Alec More if you search on 'virus' here: https://findingseth.com/q/virus/ For instance: "This means, of course, that you do not fall victim to a disease, or catch a virus, but that for one reason or another your own feelings, thoughts, and beliefs lead you to [unconsciously] seek bouts of illness." —Seth, The Way Toward Health, Chapter 2: January 28, 1984 And: "thoughts move far quicker of course than viruses. The action of the virus follows the thought. Each thought is registered biologically. Basically (underlined), when you have an immunity to a disease you have a mental immunity." —Seth, The Individual and the Nature of Mass Events, Chapter 6: Session 841, March 14, 1979 Again: "...ideas of the most optimistic nature are the biologically pertinent ones." —Seth, The Way Toward Health, Chapter 14: June 27, 1984 aka the power of positive thinking

(I [Jane Roberts' husband, Robert Butts] was wondering why a body of knowledge like [the Seth material] couldn't have accumulated over the centuries, slowly.) "It has. But it has been taken into various doctrines and religions that have grown up about it until it is almost unrecognizable. Bits of it appear here and there, scattered, distorted, and misleading. It comes naked and everyone must put clothing on it, which usually ends up as either nonsense or armored dogma...." --Seth, Session 35

From below: If there were no idiots among you, you would soon find that geniuses were absent also. ... In no way do I mean to demean the indisputable value of geniuses, or their great contributions to the quality of life— but the quality of life is, again, also benefited by the existence of idiots. Not only because both ends of the scale are necessary for genetic reasons, but also because idiots themselves are in no way considered failures or defects by nature. Those terms are human judgments. Idiots also serve their role by moderating the sometimes fierce hold that the reasoning mind can (underlined) have upon human activity. -----+----- In many cases your scientists seem to have the strange idea that you can understand a reality by destroying it; that you can perceive the life mechanism of an animal by killing it; or that you can examine a phenomenon best by separating yourself from it. So, often, you attempt to examine the nature of the brain in man by destroying the brains of animals, by separating portions of the animal brain from its components, isolating them, and tampering with the overall integrity of both the animal in question and of your own spiritual processes. By this I mean that each such attempt puts you more out of context, so to speak, with yourself and your environment, and other species. Period. While you may "learn" certain so?called facts, you are driven still further away from any great knowledge, because the so?called facts stand in your way. You do not as yet understand the uniqueness of consciousness. (Very emphatically:) It is absurd to believe that you can learn something about consciousness by destroying it. It is absurd to believe that you can learn one iota about the inner reality of life when your search leads you to destroy it. Destruction, you see, in your terms (underlined twice), presupposes a misunderstanding of life to begin with. There are ways of identifying with animals, with atoms and molecules. There are ways of learning from the animals. There are methods that can be used to discover how different species migrate, for example, and then to duplicate such feats technologically if you want to. These methods do not include dissection, for what you learn that way you will not be able to use (deeper and much louder). In a way you are simply over-exuberant, like children playing a new game. You will discover that at best you are using children's blocks. Some of you have already come to that conclusion. As this book continues, I will indeed outline some beginning proposals as to ways in which you can use your consciousness to understand the nature of reality, and to make some of those inner blueprints clear. Now: Even in your terms of history and serial time, as a race you have tried various methods of dealing with the physical world.6 In this latest venture you are discovering that exterior manipulation is not enough, that technology alone is not "the answer." Please understand me: There is nothing wrong with a loving technology. If Einstein had been a better mathematician,7 he would not have made the breakthroughs that he did. He would have been too cowed. Yet even then his mathematics did hold him back, and put a kink in his intuitions. Often you take it for granted that intuitive knowledge is not practical, will not work, or will not give you diagrams. Those same diagrams of which science is so proud, however, can also be barriers, giving you a dead instead of a living knowledge. Therefore, they can be quite impractical. I admit that I am being sneaky here; but if you did not feel the need to kill animals to gain knowledge, then you would not have wars, either. You would understand the balances of nature far better. If you did not feel any need to destroy reality (in your terms) in order to understand it, then you would not need to dissect animals, hoping to discover the reasons for human diseases. You would have attained a living knowledge long ago, in which diseases as such did not occur. You would have understood long ago the connections between mind and body, feelings, health, and illness. I am not saying that you would have necessarily had a perfect world, but that you would have been dealing more directly with the blueprints for reality. Your specializations work as long as you stay within the framework, though then you must wrestle with the questions that such divisions automatically entail. It is perhaps difficult for you to realize that these are written and verbalized categories that in no real manner tell you anything about the actual experience of other creatures— but only note habits, tendencies, and separations of the most exterior nature. If your purpose is to comprehend what other living creatures perceive, then the methods you are using are at the best short? sighted, and at the worst they completely defeat your purpose. For example: No matter what information or data you receive as the result of animal experimentation or dissection for scientific purposes, and no matter how valuable the results appear to be, the consequences of such methods are so distorted that you comprehend less of life than you did before. SESSION 910 —April 23, 1980 (The Dominican Republic is an economically very poor country occupying the eastern portion of the island of Hispaniola in the West Indies. Yesterday Jane and I reread an article I'd filed last September, then forgotten about: In the area surrounding a certain village in the Dominican Republic, 38 girls have turned into boys at the onset of puberty. These remarkable physical changes stem from a genetic "defect" carried by a common ancestor who lived more than a century ago. The men have low sperm counts and may not be able to sire children in the normal manner, yet Jane and I think that this rare group event—the only one of its kind on record—fits in with Seth's material about the millions of variations contained within our species' vast genetic pool. For whatever mysterious reasons, then, our overall consciousness wants and needs this particular "genetic culture." See the portion of the last session given as the opening of this chapter. Then today we read how scientists at a company that markets animals for medical research have bred a strain of hairless laboratory mice without thymes glands. The thymes gland helps a body create immunity against outside infections. Scientists often use "athymic" mice in cancer research, for example, since the mice do not reject tumor transplants. [Indeed, these animals are so sensitive to disease of any kind that they must be raised under sterile conditions.] Jane was very upset by the article and mentioned it to me several times. If there were no idiots among you, you would soon find that geniuses were absent also. Those human abilities that you consider to be characteristic of your species are, again, dependent upon the existence of infinite numbers of variations that appear in the aggregate, to give you often obviously opposing states. What you think of then as the average intelligence is a condition that exists because of the activity of constant variables, minute variations that give you at one end of the scale the idiot, and at the other the genius. Both are necessary to maintain that larger "norm" of mental activity. I am using the word "norm" here for your convenience, though I disagree with the ways in which the term has been used, when it has been set up as a rule (underlined) of measurement, psychologically speaking. The genetic systems is not closed, therefore. The genes do not simply hold information without any reference to the body's living system. It does not exist, then—the genetic structure—like some highly complicated mechanism already programmed, started and functioning "blindly," so that once it is set into operation there is no chance for modification. Particularly in your own species there is a great give?and?take between human genetic systems, the environment, and cultural events— and by cultural events I mean events having to do with your peculiarly unique field of activity that includes the worlds of politics, economics, and so forth. (Pause.) Genetic events are not irrefutable in a deterministic fashion. They represent strong inclinations toward certain bodily or mental activity, certain biological preferences. They lead toward the activation of certain events over others, so that the probabilities are "loaded" in certain directions. (Pause.) Genetic events are (underlined) then events, though at a different level of activity than you are used to thinking of. We are speaking of chromosomal messages. These are not written within the chromosomes as words might be written upon paper, but the information and the chromosomes are a living unit. The information is alive (intently). We are speaking about a kind of biological cuneiform, in which the structures, the very physical structures, of the cells contain all of the knowledge needed to form a physical body— to form themselves. This is indeed knowledge in biological form, and biologically (underlined) making its clearest living statement. (9:27.) The cells [with their] genetic packages, like all cells, react to stimuli. They act. They are aware of all of the body's events biologically. In ways impossible to verbalize, they are also aware of the environment of the body as it is perceived at biological levels. I have said before that in one way or another each living cell is united with each other living cell through a system of inner communication. "Programmed" genetic activity can be altered by conditions in the environment. (Long pause.) I am not simply saying that genetic activity can be changed, for example, through something like a nuclear accident, but that highly beneficial alterations can also take place in genetic behavior, as in your terms the genetic structure not only prepares the species for any contingency, but also prepares it by triggering those characteristics and abilities that are needed by the species at any given time, and also by making allowances for such future developments (all quite forcefully). Your genetic structure reacts to each thought that you have, to the state of your emotions, to your psychological climate. In your terms, it contains the physical history of the species in context with the probable future capabilities of the species. You choose your genetic structure so that it suits the challenges and capabilities of the species. You choose your genetic structure so that it suits the challenges and potentials that you have chosen. (Long pause.) It represents your physical reference point, your bodily framework. It is your personal physical property. It is a portion of physical matter that you have identified, filled out with your own identity. It is like a splendid ship, the body, that you have chosen ahead of time for a splendid challenging adventure—a ship that you have personally appointed that is equipped to serve as much as possible as a physical manifestation of your person hood . Some people, in beginning such a venture, will indeed insist upon an excellent vessel, with the most sophisticated mechanisms, equipped with grand couches and a banquet room. Others would want much more excitement, much more zest, and order then instead a less grand vessel, but one that went faster. Some would set goals for themselves that demanded that their powers of seamanship be tested. The analogy may be a simple one, yet each person chooses the living vessel of the body, with his or her own intents and purposes in mind. (Long pause.) In physical reality, if you will forgive me, life is the name of the game—and the game is based upon value fulfillment. That means simply that each form of life seeks toward the fulfillment and unfolding of all of the capacities that it senses within its living framework, knowing that in that individual fulfillment each other species of life is also benefited. (9:45.) In no way do I mean to demean the indisputable value of geniuses, or their great contributions to the quality of life— but the quality of life is, again, also benefited by the existence of idiots. Not only because both ends of the scale are necessary for genetic reasons, but also because idiots themselves are in no way considered failures or defects by nature. Those terms are human judgments. Idiots also serve their role by moderating the sometimes fierce hold that the reasoning mind can (underlined) have upon human activity. The idiot is often able to experience in his or her own reality a freer, more generous, more faithful flow of emotional states, unhampered by reason's sometimes stern dictates, and it is important that such a moderating tendency does operate genetically. I will have more to say on that subject later in the book. The reasoning mind, as you have used it thus far, roughly (underlined) since the birth of Christianity, has used—instead of used, confined—has confined its reasoning abilities to a very narrow spectrum of reality. It has seen the value of life largely only as that life conforms to its own standards. (Pause.) That is, the reasoning mind, as you have used it, considers that only the reasoning creatures are capable of understanding life's values. Other forms of life have almost seemed beside the point, their value considered only insofar as they were of service to man. But man's life is obviously dependent upon the existence of life's other species, and with him those species share certain values. Life is sacred—all life—and again, all life seeks value fulfillment, not simply physical survival. Ruburt read an article about the development of a strain of mice without thymes. Since the thymus is very important in the necessary process of maintaining bodily resistance to disease, these particular mice have little resistance. They are bred and sold for experimental purposes. The intent of such procedures is to promote the quality of human life, to study the nature of diseases, and hopefully apply what is learned to some of the lives of human beings. Mice are not considered human. They are not. So like any animal, they are thought of as dispensable, sacrificed to a fine humanitarian end. (Long pause.) Perhaps at first that prejudice of the reasoning mind might escape you, since after all mice are far divorced from your own species. (louder:) There were Jews sacrificed to the same end not too long ago, and the reasoning was largely the same, though in that case you were dealing with your own species. (10:05.) Jews were considered almost not human, however, and whenever such atrocities against your own species are concerned, you indulge in the same kind of twisted reasoning (underlined). Because the Jews were considered less than human—or, at best, human defects—they were thought of as justifiable; sacrifices on the altar of "the genetic betterment of mankind." You cannot improve the quality of your own lives by destroying the quality of any other kinds of life. There is no genetic master race. The very classification of the species into races to begin with is based upon distinctions that are ridiculously minute in the overall picture of the similarities. Ruburt was incensed by the article that he read, and he said indignantly that such procedures involve a biological immorality. I usually avoid terms like "morality" or "immorality," since their definitions vary according to the individual. The proceedings, however, do involve a biological violation, a going against nature's flow and intent, a process in which a form of life is made to go against its own value fulfillment, and it is because of such attitudes involving other kinds of life that the horrors of the Jewish war camps were made possible. NOTES: 1. Jane and I are both aware of and frustrated by the obvious ambiguities in our own feelings about the use of animals in medical research. We also think that most other people have such mixed feelings, whether they realize it or not. Were either of our own physical lives saved—perhaps even before birth—by those using knowledge gained from animal experimentation? We don't know. We do know that it's much easier to condone a philosophy espousing traumatic and repetitive animal research if one is relatively shielded from it. However, if given a choice, Jane and I now would forgo the "benefits" stemming from animal experimentation, even if our own future welfares were to suffer because of a subsequent lack of knowledge—and providing that at a time of crisis we didn't weaken in our joint resolve! Following such a course would actually be most difficult, so pervasive in our society are the results flowing from animal research: I even think it might be necessary to live as a hermit in the wild to get away from them. Using animals in the laboratory Is imposing human goals and values upon other life forms, even though the modern scientific method is supposed to be value? free. For such research is carried out in the name of progress and the practical common good, of course—and that progress applies also in the remedial treatment of other animals, let us remember. We think that every reader of this book has benefited, and still does, from animal experimentation, some of it most cruel, in ways that he or she can hardly suspect, let alone specify: even benefiting from the use of animals in the study of medical and chemical, beauty and recreational products that can be found in practically every home in the country. Jane and I live in one of those homes. I see the passive, thinking and unthinking tolerance of animal experimentation as a classical case of a society using ends to justify means—yet in the United States, at least, we carefully teach each generation of our species that such rationalizations aren't morally acceptable.... --Seth, _Dreams, "Evolution," and Value Fulfillment_

"The natural state of the body is one of health." --Seth (Symptoms are symbolic of unresolved mental or inner issues.)

Counterparts idea: ...to some extent or another you are related to all of those alive upon the planet. You are time contemporaries. You will have a far closer relationship with some than with others. Some will be your counterparts. These may or may not be closer to you than family relationships, but psychically speaking they will share a certain kind of history with you. You will also be connected through the physical framework of the earth in the large give-and-take of its space-time scheme. Session 731 ...you might well have four or five counterparts alive in one century, as you might have four or five family members spanning the same amount of time. Session 724 [Elsewhere, Seth said the idea of soul mates is a distortion of the counterpart idea. Also, one might have a marked dislike of a counterpart. As one may be closer to some family members than others, one may be closer to some counterparts than others.] In ["ESP"] class, Emma (Hariston) and Jack (Pierce) are counterparts. (To me [Jane's husband]:) You and Jack are counterparts, but you and Emma are not. Earl (Williams) and Sam (Garret) are counterparts. To my readers these names mean nothing. Yet in each case the relationships noted indicate inner realizations and connections. The same realities appear in each of your lives. Will Petrosky and Ben (Fein) are counterparts.... Session 732

If one uncovers the message of a symptom, the problem will go away. A simple example: Once, when I had a cold, I realized the reason for the cold and the symptoms of the cold went away in minutes like a minor miracle. Unfortunately, I usually can't figure out the reason for a cold. Virus? Seth asserts one has deadly viruses in one's body but they are in equilibrium with the body and only become deadly when "activated" by one's, in short, negative thinking. I also cleared up tendonitis in my wrist (I thought I was on the road to carpal tunnel syndrome) in similar, quick, minor-miracle fashion. For details, see _The Nature of Personal Reality_.

Since 2003, the word “blemish” triggers that song and that record.

God = All That Is, a primary pyramid energy gestalt

"The theory of evolution... brings about its own hypnotic focus... "It can, even in scientific terms, never be proven. [No one can live long enough to see a new species evolutionarily arise. --Mark] "It is indeed no more than a point of view. It has colored man's societies and cultures since its inception. It has dominated economic systems.... "Sexual, economic, social, and even religious behavior became tinged by these concepts. "Darwinian concepts ... certainly did not admit any altruistic animal intent." --Seth, Deleted Sess of 08\27/77 ''All religions are distortive. For that matter much of your science is distortive [as it hews so closely to materialism; materialism is for evolutionists --Mark]. Both arrive at approximations, at best, of reality. Religion has been the cause of much prejudice and cruelty; but the bomb over Hiroshima [and Nagasaki] was not caused by the Catholic Saint Theresa showering down any roses. The distortions in science and religion have been truly disastrous.'' --Seth, Sess 34 "Your particular society has set up such an artificial division between intuitional and intellectual knowledge [Seth advocates trying to marry intuition with the intellect, the problem with that, for scientists, is that that is an art --Mark] that only the intellectually apparent is given credence. With all of their dire faults and distortions, religions have at least kept alive the idea of unseen, valid worlds [distorted as heavens and hells --Mark]..." --Seth, Session 691, The "Unknown" Reality To the near-death experience skeptic who asserts that the experience amounts to the hallucinations of a dying brain, I say, funny how such hallucinations subsequently take away the experiencer's fear of death.

Seth insists the dream universe is real; it's just not physical. He asserts dreams continue even though you have awoken from sleep and returned your consciousness to physical reality. "The dream state appears chaotic, shadowy, suspicious, or even meaningless, precisely because in life you are so brilliantly focused in daily reality that dreams appear to be staticky objective background noise, left over from when you sleep. But that is how physical experience would seem to someone not focused in it, or inexperienced with its organization." (from the same book above) Also, from THE NATURE OF THE PSYCHE: ITS HUMAN EXPRESSION Session 786: "In a manner of speaking, dream reality is closer to the true nature of events than your experience with physical events leads you to suppose. "Dreams often seem chaotic because your point of reference is too small to contain the added dimensions of actuality."

the guy is a prick, Coverdale not Jonesy

Humans all over the place: https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/sethquotes/conversations/messages/1432

Tomihiro Kono, Personas from The Art of Wig Making vol.2 - The second chapter interactive wig exhibition, in Tokyo

Pluto's anatomy, Starlog Magazine, April, 1979

“World Destruction” – Time Zone “Nemesis” – Shriekback “Sweet Bird Of Truth” – The The “Finishing Touches” – Warren Zevon “The Front” – Wayne Horvitz/The President “Yashar” – Cabaret Voltaire “Godless” – The Dandy Warhols “Everlong” – Foo Fighters “The Torture Never Stops” – Frank Zappa “Many Rivers To Cross” – Joe Cocker version .

Mr Giltrap in on the act too! https://www.facebook.com/GordonGiltrapMusic